analyze-selective-testing
Analyzes Xcode selective testing effectiveness for a test run, showing which test targets were skipped or ran, and diagnosing regressions in test selection. Can compare two test runs to identify what changed.
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/tuist/agent-skills --skill analyze-selective-testingIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
This skill is a diagnostic tool for analyzing Tuist's selective testing effectiveness. It uses the Tuist CLI to inspect test run data and identify reasons for cache misses or regressions.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykpass
Risk: LOW · No issues
- ZeroLeakspass
Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed
What does this agent skill do?
Analyze Selective Testing
Quick Start
- Run
tuist test list --jsonto find test runs. - Run
tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --jsonto see per-target selective testing status. - If effectiveness dropped, compare targets between a known-good run and the regressed run.
Step 1: Resolve Test Runs
Find the test run to analyze
List recent test runs, optionally filtering by branch:
tuist test list --json --page-size 10
tuist test list --git-branch feature-x --json --page-size 5
Get basic info for a specific test run:
tuist test show <test-run-id> --json
Use this to confirm the run's branch, status, scheme, and environment (xcode_version, macos_version).
Defaults
- If no test run is specified, use the most recent CI test run on the current branch.
- For comparison, use the most recent CI test run on the project's default branch.
Step 2: Drill Into Selective Testing Targets
List per-target selective testing data for a test run:
tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --json
Each target includes:
- name: The test target name
- hit_status:
miss(ran),local(skipped via local cache), orremote(skipped via remote cache) - hash: The selective testing hash for this target
Filter by status to focus your analysis:
tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --hit-status miss --json
tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --hit-status local --json
tuist test xcode target list <test-run-id> --hit-status remote --json
Assess effectiveness
Count the targets by status:
effectiveness = (local_hits + remote_hits) / total_targets * 100
| Effectiveness | Verdict |
|---|---|
| 60-100% | Healthy — most unchanged tests are being skipped |
| 30-60% | Moderate — some cache invalidation occurring, worth investigating |
| 0-30% | Low — likely a core dependency changed or the cache was invalidated |
| 0% | Cold cache — first run, environment change, or full invalidation |
Step 3: Diagnose Regressions
If effectiveness dropped, investigate:
Check for global invalidation
If nearly all targets show as miss, the entire selective testing cache was invalidated. Common causes:
| Cause | How to verify |
|---|---|
| Xcode version change | Compare xcode_version between good and bad runs via tuist test show |
| CI environment change | Compare macos_version, model_identifier between runs |
| Project graph or dependency change | Check git history for changes to project manifests, dependency versions, or target configurations |
| Core dependency change | A widely-depended-on target changed, invalidating all its dependents |
Note: Tuist CLI version upgrades rarely cause hash invalidation — the hash version is not updated on every release.
Check for cascade invalidation
If only some targets show as miss, a dependency change likely cascaded:
- Run
tuist test xcode target list <good-run-id> --jsonandtuist test xcode target list <bad-run-id> --json. - Match targets by name — identify those that changed from
local/remotetomiss. - Compare hashes for changed targets — if a target's hash differs, its sources or dependencies changed.
- Look for a common dependency among the invalidated targets.
Compare two test runs
For each target:
- Match by
name - Compare
hit_status(hit -> miss = invalidated, miss -> hit = improved) - Compare
hash(different hash = target or its dependencies changed)
Step 4: Recommendations
Based on the diagnosis:
- Environment change: Ensure CI uses consistent Xcode/macOS versions. This is the most common cause of full cache invalidation.
- Cascade from dependency change: Consider if the change to the root target was necessary. If the root target is a widely-shared module, consider splitting it.
- Cold cache on new branch: Run tests once to warm the cache. Subsequent runs will benefit from selective testing.
Summary Format
Produce a summary with:
- Overall: effectiveness percentage, verdict (healthy/moderate/low/cold)
- Target breakdown: targets grouped by hit status
- Comparison (if applicable): targets that changed status between runs, with hash diffs
- Root cause: what caused the regression
- Recommendations: actionable next steps
Example:
Selective Testing Analysis: test run abc123 on feature-x
Effectiveness: 15% (3/20 targets skipped) -- LOW
Local hits: 2 targets (CoreTests, UtilTests)
Remote hits: 1 target (NetworkTests)
Misses: 17 targets
Comparison with baseline (run def456, 75% effectiveness):
14 targets changed from hit to miss
All changed targets have different hashes
Root cause: Xcode version changed from 15.2 to 16.0 between runs.
This changed all target hashes, invalidating the entire cache.
Recommendations:
- Align CI Xcode version with the version used in the baseline run.
- If the upgrade is intentional, run tests once to re-warm the cache.
Done Checklist
- Identified the test run(s) to analyze
- Drilled into per-target selective testing status via
tuist test xcode target list - Diagnosed root cause if effectiveness is low
- Compared targets with baseline if regression detected
- Provided actionable recommendations
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/tuist/agent-skills/analyze-selective-testing">View analyze-selective-testing on skillZs</a>