skillZs
★ LIVE SKILL TAGS ★
>>> LIVE SKILLS INDEX <<<
* OPEN SOURCE *
NO LOGIN, NO TRACKING
※ REAL INSTALL DATA ※
← back to all skills
smithery.ai279 installs

code-review

Reviews code changes for bugs, security issues, and quality problems. Use for a single-pass review of a PR, branch, or local diff; for large PRs that span several subsystems, use deep-review (`.agents/skills/deep-review/`).

How do I install this agent skill?

npx skills add https://smithery.ai --skill code-review
view source ↗

Is this agent skill safe to install?

  • Socketpass

    No alerts

What does this agent skill do?

Code Review Skill

Review code changes in coder/coder and identify bugs, security issues, and quality problems.

Workflow

  1. Get the code changes - Use the method provided in the prompt, or if none specified:

    • For a PR: gh pr diff <PR_NUMBER> --repo coder/coder
    • For local changes: git diff main or git diff --staged
  2. Read full files and related code before commenting - verify issues exist and consider how similar code is implemented elsewhere in the codebase

  3. Analyze for issues - Focus on what could break production

  4. Report findings - Use the method provided in the prompt, or summarize directly

Severity Levels

  • 🔴 CRITICAL: Security vulnerabilities, auth bypass, data corruption, crashes
  • 🟡 IMPORTANT: Logic bugs, race conditions, resource leaks, unhandled errors
  • 🔵 NITPICK: Minor improvements, style issues, portability concerns

What to Look For

  • Security: Auth bypass, injection, data exposure, improper access control
  • Correctness: Logic errors, off-by-one, nil/null handling, error paths
  • Concurrency: Race conditions, deadlocks, missing synchronization
  • Resources: Leaks, unclosed handles, missing cleanup
  • Error handling: Swallowed errors, missing validation, panic paths
  • Frontend (site/src/): audit against the FE rule IDs in Frontend Patterns and cite the rule ID in findings (for example, "FE7: re-typed query key")

What NOT to Comment On

  • Style that matches existing Coder patterns (check AGENTS.md first)
  • Code that already exists unchanged
  • Theoretical issues without concrete impact
  • Changes unrelated to the PR's purpose

Coder-Specific Patterns

Authorization Context

// Public endpoints needing system access
dbauthz.AsSystemRestricted(ctx)

// Authenticated endpoints with user context - just use ctx
api.Database.GetResource(ctx, id)

Error Handling

// OAuth2 endpoints use RFC-compliant errors
httpapi.WriteOAuth2Error(ctx, rw, http.StatusBadRequest, codersdk.OAuth2ErrorCodeInvalidGrant, "description")

// Regular endpoints use httpapi
httpapi.Write(ctx, rw, http.StatusBadRequest, codersdk.Response{...})

Shell Scripts

set -u only catches UNDEFINED variables, not empty strings:

unset VAR; echo ${VAR}         # ERROR with set -u
VAR=""; echo ${VAR}            # OK with set -u (empty is fine)
VAR="${INPUT:-}"; echo ${VAR}  # OK - always defined

GitHub Actions context variables (github.*, inputs.*) are always defined.

Review Quality

  • Explain impact ("causes crash when X" not "could be better")
  • Make observations actionable with specific fixes
  • Read the full context before commenting on a line
  • Check AGENTS.md for project conventions before flagging style

Comment Standards

  • Only comment when confident - If you're not 80%+ sure it's a real issue, don't comment. Verify claims before posting.
  • No speculation about bugs - For correctness and security issues, avoid "might", "could", "consider"; state facts or skip. Design suggestions may be phrased as questions ("Could we use X instead?").
  • Verify technical claims - Check documentation or code before asserting how something works. Don't guess at API behavior or syntax rules.

Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.

<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/smithery.ai/code-review">View code-review on skillZs</a>