scope-creep-detector
Analyzes git diffs against a stated intent to detect scope creep, unrelated files, broad pull requests, changes that grew beyond a fix, dependency additions, public API renames, config or CI edits, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files. Use when the user asks whether a change grew beyond the fix, a PR is too broad, or what unrelated stuff they touched, and wants keep, split, or justify guidance. Operates locally and offline.
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill scope-creep-detectorIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
The 'scope-creep-detector' skill is a development tool designed to analyze git diffs locally to identify unrelated changes or new dependencies. It operates entirely offline using the Python standard library and interacts with the local git binary in a safe, structured manner. No malicious patterns, network exfiltration, or dangerous command executions were detected.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykwarn
Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue
What does this agent skill do?
Scope Creep Detector
A one-line fix should not require a reviewer to reverse-engineer fourteen files across three subsystems. This skill compares a git diff with its stated intent, surfaces scope signals, and turns them into keep, split, or justify decisions.
Everything runs locally. The script makes no network calls and does not change the working tree, index, commits, or branches.
When to use
- Before opening a pull request whose diff may have grown beyond its intent
- When a bug fix touches unexpected files or subsystems
- When the user asks whether staged changes are too broad
- When a diff includes dependency, public API, config, CI, or build changes
- When the user wants a concrete split plan for a mixed change
When not to use
- Formatting code, running a linter, or writing a commit message
- Reviewing correctness, security, or test quality inside an agreed scope
- Measuring historical project growth across many commits
- Editing or reverting files without the user's approval
Establish the intent
Use the user's one-line intent when available. Keep it concrete, such as
fix null dereference in parser or add retry limit to webhook delivery.
If no intent was given, the script falls back to the current branch name. If that name is generic, detached, or unrelated to the work, ask for one line of intent before treating relatedness as meaningful.
Run the classifier
Run from this skill directory and point --repo at the target repository.
Working tree diff:
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo \
--intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json
Staged diff:
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo --staged \
--intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json
Branch diff against a merge base:
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo --base main \
--intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json
Saved diff or stdin:
python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --diff change.diff --intent "parser fix" --json
git diff --staged | python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --diff - \
--intent "parser fix" --json
Use --hunk-threshold only when the repository has a documented reason to
change the default churn threshold. Do not tune the threshold merely to make a
warning disappear.
Interpret the JSON
Read references/scope-signals.md before making a recommendation. Treat the classifier as triage evidence, not proof of authorial intent.
in_scope: file paths with at least one intent/path keyword overlaplikely_creep: paths without overlap, with the reason and detected signalsnew_deps: dependencies introduced in supported manifest formatsapi_renames: nearby removed and added public function or class declarationsconfig_edits: CI, container, build, YAML, and TOML changesstats: churn, subsystem counts, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files
Empty arrays are evidence too. Say that no signal was detected, not that the diff is guaranteed to be in scope.
Recommend keep, split, or justify
Give every item in likely_creep one disposition:
- Keep when the path is necessary for the stated intent and the connection is direct. Explain the connection in one sentence.
- Split when it can land independently, belongs to another subsystem, or introduces a dependency, API rename, config edit, or large hunk that is not required for the intent. Name the files or hunks for the follow-up change.
- Justify when a cross-cutting edit cannot be separated safely. State the invariant or build constraint that requires it and call out reviewer risk.
Prefer split when evidence is ambiguous. Never claim that a zero overlap score proves a file is unrelated. Path vocabulary is a cheap, deterministic proxy.
Write the scope report
Use this compact structure:
- Intent and diff source
- Files and subsystems touched, with total additions and deletions
- In-scope changes
- Likely creep with signal evidence
- Keep, split, or justify table
- Proposed follow-up grouping, if any
Name file paths and hunk headers. For an oversized mixed hunk, explain that the script cannot split it automatically and describe the smallest coherent edit. Ask before applying any split, revert, staging, or commit operation.
Files
scripts/scope_creep.py: deterministic unified-diff parser and classifierreferences/scope-signals.md: signal definitions, thresholds, and limits
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps/scope-creep-detector">View scope-creep-detector on skillZs</a>