skillZs
★ LIVE SKILL TAGS ★
>>> LIVE SKILLS INDEX <<<
* OPEN SOURCE *
NO LOGIN, NO TRACKING
※ REAL INSTALL DATA ※
← back to all skills
sharpdeveye/maestro328 installs

calibrate

Use when workflow components are inconsistent, naming conventions vary, or a new team member's work needs alignment to project standards.

How do I install this agent skill?

npx skills add https://github.com/sharpdeveye/maestro --skill calibrate
view source ↗

Is this agent skill safe to install?

  • Gen Agent Trust Hubpass

    No security issues detected. The skill provides a framework for maintaining consistency in project workflows, naming conventions, and code standards.

  • Socketpass

    No alerts

  • Snykpass

    Risk: LOW · No issues

  • ZeroLeakspass

    Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed

What does this agent skill do?

MANDATORY PREPARATION

Invoke /agent-workflow — it contains workflow principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no workflow context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-maestro first. Consult the prompt-engineering reference in the agent-workflow skill for naming and style consistency patterns.


Ensure consistency across all workflow components. Inconsistency creates confusion — for the model, for developers, and for users.

Calibration Dimensions

Naming Conventions

  • Tool names follow consistent pattern (verb_noun, noun.verb, or camelCase — pick one)
  • Agent names follow consistent pattern
  • Configuration keys follow consistent pattern
  • File names follow consistent pattern

Prompt Style

  • All prompts use the same structural pattern (4-zone)
  • Consistent delimiter style (XML tags, markdown headers, triple-dash)
  • Consistent output schema format (JSON schema, markdown template)
  • Consistent instruction style (imperative, numbered steps)

Error Handling

  • All tools return errors in the same format
  • Error codes follow consistent scheme
  • Error messages follow consistent tone
  • Retry logic uses consistent strategy

Logging

  • All logs use the same format (JSON structured, text, etc.)
  • Consistent field names across all log entries
  • Consistent log levels (debug, info, warn, error)
  • Consistent PII redaction approach

Calibration Process

  1. Identify the standard: What's the most common pattern in the existing codebase? That's the standard.
  2. List deviations: Find all components that deviate from the standard.
  3. Prioritize: Fix the most impactful deviations first (user-facing > internal).
  4. Apply: Make the changes, ensuring tests still pass.
  5. Document: Update .maestro.md with the established conventions.

Consistency Audit Table

DimensionStandardDeviations FoundPriority
Tool naming?? of ? toolsHigh/Med/Low
Prompt structure?? of ? promptsHigh/Med/Low
Error format?? of ? toolsHigh/Med/Low
Log format?? of ? entriesHigh/Med/Low

Calibration Checklist

  • Convention standard identified for each dimension
  • All deviations listed with location
  • Highest impact deviations fixed first
  • Tests pass after each calibration change
  • Updated .maestro.md with established conventions

Recommended Next Step

After calibration, run /refine for a final polish pass, or /evaluate to verify consistency improvements.

NEVER:

  • Invent new conventions when existing ones work
  • Calibrate in a way that changes behavior (this is standardization, not refactoring)
  • Skip test verification after calibration
  • Change naming conventions without updating all references

Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.

<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/sharpdeveye/maestro/calibrate">View calibrate on skillZs</a>