checkout-commit-push-pr

Complete Git Workflow

DO NOT ASK ME WHAT TO DO. Just follow the workflow below. The only exceptions: a questionable untracked file (per step 2) or a diverged local default branch (per step 1) — stop and flag those instead of guessing.

1. Check current branch and changes

   Do that via

   git status
   

   Examine ALL pending changes to inform our git commit/PR messages — plain git diff only shows unstaged edits to tracked files, so also check what's already staged:

   git diff
   git diff --staged
   

   For untracked files you intend to commit, read their contents — a new file IS the change, and no diff command shows it.

   Resolve the repo's default branch — do not assume it is main:

   # Fast and local (may error if origin/HEAD is unset on older clones)
   git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD | sed 's|^origin/||'
   
   # Fallback if the above errors
   gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name
   

   If already on a non-default branch, stay on it. Only create a new branch if currently on the default branch — NEVER commit or push directly to the default branch, whatever it's named (main, master, develop, ...).

   If on the default branch, create and checkout a new branch using this naming convention:

   [optional LINEAR-IDENTIFIER-][2-4 descriptive words]-[MMDD]
   

   • LINEAR-IDENTIFIER (optional): when this work has a known Linear issue, prefix the branch with its identifier (e.g. DATA-24-). This lets later tooling discover the issue from the branch name and cross-link the PR.
   • 2-4 words: Lowercase, separated by dashes, describing the issue being fixed
   • Date: Today's date in MMDD format (e.g. July 12th → 0712)

   Examples:

   • fix-sqlfluff-errors-1214 (December 14th)
   • update-dbt-models-0103 (January 3rd)
   • DATA-24-improve-dagster-debug-skill-0527 (issue-prefixed)

   Before branching, make sure the local default branch is up to date so the new branch isn't based on stale code (a stale base causes unrelated diffs and avoidable conflicts in the PR). Uncommitted local changes are fine — git pull --ff-only won't touch them; if it fails because the local branch has diverged, stop and flag it rather than rebasing or merging on your own.

   git pull --ff-only
   git checkout -b <new-branch-name-MMDD>
   

2. Stage files deliberately and commit with a descriptive message:

   Review what git status reported in step 1 before staging anything:

   • Modified/deleted tracked files: stage them all — that's the work being shipped.
   • Untracked files: stage only those that belong to the change. Do NOT stage files that look like secrets, local config, or scratch output (e.g. .env*, credentials*, *.key, .DS_Store, editor swap files, large data dumps, one-off debug scripts). If an untracked file is ambiguous, read it first.
   • If something questionable would be committed, stop and flag it to me instead of guessing.

   # Stage all tracked changes
   git add -u
   
   # Stage intended untracked files explicitly, by name
   git add <new-file-1> <new-file-2>
   
   # Confirm exactly what will be committed
   git status
   git diff --staged --stat
   
   # Commit with descriptive message, informed by the diff from step 1
   git commit -m "<Overview of the change>
   
   - <item 1 in the more specific bulleted list of changes>
   - ...
   "
   

3. Check for PR template:

   Before creating the PR, check if the repository has a PR template:

   # Check common PR template locations
   ls .github/pull_request_template.md .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md 2>/dev/null
   

   • If a template exists, read it and use its structure for the PR body
   • Fill in all required sections from the template
   • If no template exists, use the default format below

   If a Linear issue is known at this point — either passed in by an orchestrator (e.g. wrap-up-session) or auto-detected from a LINEAR-IDENTIFIER-… branch prefix — include both a closing reference and a **Ticket:** line near the top of the PR body so the PR is born linked back to the issue:

   Fixes DATA-24
   **Ticket:** [DATA-24](https://linear.app/citizen/issue/DATA-24)
   

   Use the issue’s actual URL. Use Fixes only when the PR completes the issue; otherwise use Refs. Insert both lines directly under the first heading (e.g. right under ## Description & motivation when a template is in use). If no issue identifier is known, leave them out. When called by wrap-up-session, its subsequent linear-ticket-management step creates or updates the issue and cross-links it to the PR. A standalone invocation does not create an issue.

4. Push branch and create PR:

   # Push to remote
   git push -u origin <new-branch-name-MMDD>
   
   # Create pull request (use template structure if found, otherwise use default)
   gh pr create --title "<Descriptive PR Title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
   

Summary

• <what changed and why, in a few bullets>

Changes

• <specific change 1>
• ... EOF )"

  
  Note the heredoc body and closing `EOF` start at column 0 — if they're indented,
  `EOF` won't terminate the heredoc.
  
  **Make sure you output a link to the PR** (`gh pr create` prints it).
  
  
  

5. Monitor CI/CD Checks: After creating the PR, monitor the CI/CD pipeline to ensure all checks pass:

   # Block until all checks complete — no manual polling needed
   # (add --fail-fast to return as soon as any check fails)
   gh pr checks <PR-NUMBER> --watch
   
   # View detailed information about a specific workflow run
   gh run view <RUN-ID>
   
   # View logs for a failed job
   gh run view --log-failed --job=<JOB-ID>
   

   Important: gh pr checks returns "no checks reported" with exit 1 in two different cases: (a) the repo has no workflows, or (b) workflows exist but haven't registered yet (typical 10-30s after push). Do NOT conclude "no CI configured" from that output alone.

   • First check ls .github/workflows/ — if any files exist, CI is configured and you must wait.
   • Prefer gh pr view <PR-NUMBER> --json statusCheckRollup which distinguishes "no workflows" from "pending."
   • If workflows exist but checks haven't appeared, wait ~30s and re-check.

   Goal: every required check green. Whatever checks the repo runs — linters, builds, tests, docs validation — treat each failing required check as yours to fix.

   Handling Check Failures:

   • Read the failed job's logs (gh run view --log-failed) to find the actual error — don't guess from the check name.
   • Fix the issue locally, commit, and push to the same branch; checks re-run automatically. Repeat until green.
   • Prefer the repo's own tooling for mechanical fixes (e.g. run the formatter/linter the check runs, apply its auto-fix if it has one).
   • If a failure isn't caused by your diff (flaky test, infra error, missing prerequisite like state that must be created first), stop and flag it instead of churning commits.

   Acceptable Skipped Checks:

   • Production-only checks on non-production branches
   • Conditional checks that don't apply to your changes

   When All Checks Pass:

   • PR is ready for review and merge
   • All validations have succeeded and code quality is ensured

Commit Message Format

• First line: Brief summary of changes
• Body: Bulleted list of specific changes made
• Do NOT append a Co-Authored-By: Claude trailer (or any other generated-by attribution)