write-design-docs
Write, revise, or review software design documents using Malte Ubl's "Design Docs at Google" guidance. Use when Codex needs to draft a design doc, technical design, RFC, engineering review doc, architecture proposal, mini design doc, or design-doc review focused on context, goals, non-goals, trade-offs, alternatives, cross-cutting concerns, review lifecycle, and deciding whether a design doc is warranted.
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/pproenca/dot-skills --skill write-design-docsIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
This skill provides a framework and guidance for writing software design documents based on established industry practices. It contains no executable code, network operations, or sensitive data access and is safe to use.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykpass
Risk: LOW · No issues
What does this agent skill do?
Write Design Docs
Core Workflow
Use the design doc as a problem-solving and consensus-building tool, not as an implementation manual.
-
Decide whether a design doc is warranted.
- Write one when the software design is ambiguous, complex, contentious, cross-functional, likely to benefit from senior review, or valuable as organizational memory.
- Prefer a short note, issue, or direct implementation when the solution is obvious and there are no meaningful trade-offs.
- Prefer a mini design doc for small but non-obvious changes.
-
Gather the minimum context needed to make the design concrete.
- Identify the problem, existing landscape, constraints, stakeholders, and decision deadline.
- Ask focused questions only when missing information would materially change goals, non-goals, or trade-offs.
- State assumptions explicitly when proceeding with incomplete information.
-
Draft around decisions and trade-offs.
- Start with objective context and scope.
- Define goals and non-goals as explicit boundaries.
- Present the selected design from overview to detail.
- Explain why the selected design best satisfies the goals under the known constraints.
- Compare realistic alternatives, including why they were not selected.
- Cover cross-cutting concerns such as security, privacy, reliability, observability, migrations, and operations when relevant.
-
Keep the document readable.
- Optimize for busy reviewers who need to understand the decision, not every implementation detail.
- Link to detailed requirements, prototypes, schemas, code, or prior docs instead of copying them wholesale.
- Include diagrams or compact API/data sketches only when they clarify the design trade-offs.
- Avoid large code blocks unless explaining a novel algorithm.
-
Shape the lifecycle.
- Mark the document status: draft, in review, accepted, implementing, superseded, or archived.
- Suggest the smallest useful review group first, then wider review when the design is stable.
- Update the doc while the system has not shipped if implementation reveals wrong assumptions or changed requirements.
- Link amendments or follow-up docs when the original doc diverges from reality.
Reference
Read references/design-doc-guidance.md before drafting or reviewing a substantive design doc. Use it for the article-derived template, decision checklist, section guidance, and review rubric.
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/pproenca/dot-skills/write-design-docs">View write-design-docs on skillZs</a>