using-design-skills
Which design skill, in what order. Invoke BEFORE any visual output: web page, landing page, dashboard, product UI, mobile screen, HTML report, diagram, chart, plan page, artifact, motion, redesign, 「做個頁面」, 「畫圖」, 「報告做成網頁」, plus module or API interface design. Picks one direction authority and an executor per stage, closes with an evidence check. Even a 1% chance means invoke it.
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/ohyeh/agent-scripts --skill using-design-skillsIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
The skill functions as a design workflow orchestrator, routing tasks to specialized sub-agents based on user needs. It uses local configuration files for capability discovery and manages worker agents for execution. The analysis found no malicious behavior, only standard architectural surfaces for a routing skill.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykpass
Risk: LOW · No issues
What does this agent skill do?
using-design-skills
You decide which design skills a task needs, in what order, and who
executes each stage, then defer to them. Member roster, role tables, and
executor details live in references/design-roles.md — read it at pipeline
composition time; never route from memory of it.
BYPASS
- Backend-only / non-UI work · one-line CSS or copy tweak (inline; at most consult DESIGN.md) · the user names ONE member skill for a single-skill-sized task → go direct.
- Loop-shaped non-design work (audits, plan→build) →
using-workflows.
TRIGGER
Any deliverable whose value is visual or interface-shaped: pages, screens, HTML reports/diagrams/plans, artifacts, dashboards, motion, mockups, module/API interface design.
QUESTIONS — compose the pipeline (answer in order)
Q1 Base deliverable — who owns the output? Diagram → diagram-design for
house-style consistency / mermaid / draw.io / PNG-SVG export, else the HTML
trio · report page → html · plan page → html-plan ·
web/mobile → target stack ·
Artifact → artifact file · data file → data-report · module/API/domain →
Pipeline D · token work → DESIGN.md itself · mockup-only → static HTML mockup, no build loop ·
"would this work?" → prototype, alone, no loop.
Q2 Variant. Existing interface → audit-first (authority critiques the CURRENT render before rebuild). New → direct build.
Q3 Orthogonal specialists (additive). Charts from a data file →
data-report; charts inside a page → apply charting best practice inline, since
skills-lock.json holds no dedicated chart skill. Artifact →
artifact-design, a skill bundled with the runtime rather than the lock;
mandatory before publishing, and skipped explicitly if it does not resolve this
turn. Motion or gesture → apple-design. Constraint sets load inline.
Q4 Executor per stage — the executor table in
references/design-roles.md. Direction runs INLINE; non-trivial build → agent-tmux claude persistent
worker; every review → fresh one-shot, never the author (headed vs headless:
using-tmux-agent-tools §QUESTIONS; whether a change needs a fresh reviewer:
judgment-rubrics §2).
Q5 Verifier. Render in scope → the visual quality loop below (full Gate 0
screenshot evidence). DESIGN.md-only → document-only evidence (file
hash/commit, token completeness, contrast math). Pipeline D → non-visual
loop: design comparison judged against codebase-design depth criteria by a
fresh reviewer, verdict still PASS/BLOCK. prototype → none.
SELECT — discover live, then bind roles
jq -r '.skills|keys[]' ~/.agents/.skill-lock.jsonis the installed roster; cross-check against THIS turn's active available-skills listing, because an installed directory that is not loaded is not invocable. A member gateddisable-model-invocation: true(checkhead -8) is reached by reading its SKILL.md inline, never viaSkill().- Exactly ONE direction authority for a visual pipeline (ZERO for Pipeline D / prototypes / trivial tweaks). Never stack two — they fight. An unknown skill is never auto-promoted to authority.
- A prior member that is absent or uncallable → STATE the absence and the substitute in your plan; an empty role → degrade explicitly. Never substitute silently.
- Read each selected skill's SKILL.md before its stage runs.
DEFER — cross-stage contracts
- DESIGN.md: the direction stage WRITES it (plain Read/Write — the
design-mdhelper skill was removed); every later stage and every worker prompt READS it. Workers have no chat memory — never carry direction in chat only. - Dispatch: tmux dispatches route through
using-tmux-agent-tools; worker prompts fromdelegation-templates; tiers per~/.agents/rules/model-dispatch.md§4–§5, reviewer independence §6. Fanout/dialogue need the user's exact authorization. - Loop topology (fixed): the BUILDER is a persistent worker — BLOCK findings return to the SAME builder (worker-reuse protocol). Each REVIEWER is a fresh one-shot, never the builder, never reused.
- Worker-prompt addendum: "DESIGN CONTEXT: read
{repo}/DESIGN.mdfirst; conform to its tokens. SKILL: read and follow{member-SKILL.md}first." - Diagram house defaults (these override a member's opt-in gate, never its
mechanism): a diagram whose story IS direction — data flow, architecture,
dependency, deployment — ships motion by default. Request
diagram-designmodeloopwith the Flow-token primitive (onearia-hiddentoken, cycle ≥3s, no playback controls); escalate toreveal+ Path draw only when the ORDER of hops carries meaning, and tosteponly for teaching. Every other diagram type (ER, quadrant, bar, Venn) defaults tonone— no flow to point at means motion is decoration. The static-first contract is NOT relaxed: with JS off, and in reduced-motion, print, and every export, the complete labeled figure is visible. - Format: HTML first. Every diagram and visual deliverable is a
self-contained
.html;svg/pngare EXPORTED from it, never hand-authored. Markdown (a mermaid fence) requires the user asking for it or a text-only consuming tool — never the agent's own guess that "the reader probably cannot see images".
The quality loop — no pipeline ends at "built"
Gate 0, fail-closed: the reviewer RECORDS build identity (hash/commit), artifact path/URL, screenshot path(s), viewport(s), full-page/uncropped. Desktop AND mobile for responsive deliverables. Missing/stale/cropped evidence → UNCONFIRMED → overall BLOCK; never PASS on code-only review. (Document-only exception: DESIGN.md-only deliverables record file hash/commit instead — the instant any render exists, full contract resumes.)
Quality bar: award level — work that could win at Awwwards, the Webby Awards, or FWA. "Correct and clean" is not the bar.
Review order (human is always last):
- Internal: the builder self-checks the render against the bar, then runs
up to 3 critique rounds with
advisoror an opus/sonnet one-shot. Fix between rounds. Stop when a round finds nothing that moves the work toward the bar. - External (optional, judged by difficulty): add one fresh CLI reviewer
(
consensus-gate,args.cli) for hard work — a new visual direction, complex interaction or motion, or high stakes — or when the internal rounds split. Skip it for easy work. State in the report why you added or skipped it. - User: last, with the Gate 0 evidence bundle. Each round must find a gap to the bar or stop. Never add a round only to show a review happened.
Rubric, in order: 1. THE SLOP TEST — the authority's audit rubric, judged at the quality bar above; generic gradient-hero / emoji-bullet / card-grid sameness = BLOCK regardless of correctness, and so does a render that is clean but not award-level. 2. Prose discipline — no filler, scannable hierarchy. 3. DESIGN.md conformance. 4. The stage's frozen ACCEPTANCE criteria.
What counts as BLOCK: only a rubric item above or a frozen ACCEPTANCE
criterion. Accessibility polish (hit-area, contrast, aria names, focus ring,
skip link) that no ACCEPTANCE line names is a NOTE — list it, do not BLOCK
on it, do not open a fix round for it. A reviewer that returns only NOTEs
returns VERDICT: PASS.
Report contract: per-item PASS / FAIL / UNCONFIRMED + one-line reason,
findings tagged persistent/new/regression/evidence-gap, all blockers in ONE
pass, final line exactly VERDICT: PASS or VERDICT: BLOCK, quoted
verbatim in your report. A report missing the VERDICT: line is a format
defect of that reviewer: re-ask the SAME reviewer for the one line — never
spawn another reviewer to obtain it.
Rounds: BLOCK → same persistent builder fixes → fresh reviewer re-audits. Hard cap two fix rounds, then route by CAUSE: same-root failures
- wrong-direction signals (
judgment-rubrics.md§4) → back to direction · evidence-gap → repair evidence path, re-audit · new/regression → triage separately · otherwise → stop and ask the user with the failure trail. PASS → write the final tokens into DESIGN.md, report with the evidence bundle. "Built and audited: PASS" is a completion claim; "built" alone is not.
Polish/Operate mode — human checkpoint first: the first rendered
build goes to the USER (URL/screenshot, desktop + mobile) BEFORE any
reviewer is spawned. Direction is the user's call; the reviewer only
checks the direction the user accepted. One reviewer round, not a loop.
NOT-FOUND
A needed role has no installed member → degrade the pipeline explicitly and
say what was skipped — never fake a stage. Member contracts: each skill's
own SKILL.md · roster/roles/executors: references/design-roles.md ·
worker mechanics: tmux-agent-tools · prompts: delegation-templates.
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/ohyeh/agent-scripts/using-design-skills">View using-design-skills on skillZs</a>