create-workflow-command
Create a workflow command that orchestrates multi-step execution through sub-agents with file-based task prompts
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill create-workflow-commandIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
The skill provides a framework for building multi-agent workflows. While logically sound, it introduces a potential surface for indirect prompt injection because the generated orchestrator templates lack protective delimiters or sanitization when passing raw user input to sub-agents that possess file system access.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykpass
Risk: LOW · No issues
What does this agent skill do?
Create Workflow Command
Create a command that orchestrates multi-step workflows by dispatching sub-agents with task-specific instructions stored in separate files.
User Input
Workflow Name: $1
Description: $2
Architecture Overview
Workflow commands solve the context bloat problem: instead of embedding detailed step instructions in the main command (polluting orchestrator context), store them in separate task files that sub-agents read on-demand.
plugins/<plugin-name>/
├── commands/
│ └── <workflow>.md # Lean orchestrator (~50-100 tokens per step)
├── agents/ # Optional: reusable executor agents
│ └── step-executor.md # Custom agent with specific tools/behavior
└── tasks/ # All task instructions directly here
├── step-1-<name>.md # Full instructions (~500+ tokens each)
├── step-2-<name>.md
├── step-3-<name>.md
└── common-context.md # Shared context across workflows
Key Principles
1. Context Isolation
Each sub-agent gets its own isolated context window. The main orchestrator stays lean while sub-agents load detailed instructions from files.
| Component | Context Cost | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Orchestrator command | ~50-100 tokens/step | Dispatch and coordinate |
| Task file | ~500+ tokens | Detailed step instructions |
| Sub-agent base | ~294 tokens | System prompt overhead |
2. Sub-Agent Capabilities
Sub-agents spawned via Task tool:
| Capability | Available | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Read tool | ✅ Yes | Can read any file |
| Write tool | ✅ Yes | If not restricted |
| Grep/Glob | ✅ Yes | For code search |
| Skills loading | ❌ No | Skills don't auto-load in sub-agents |
| Spawn sub-agents | ❌ No | Cannot nest Task tool |
| Resume context | ✅ Yes | Via resume parameter |
3. File Reference Pattern
Use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} for portable paths within plugin:
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1-workflow-name.md and execute.
Sub-agent will use Read tool to fetch the file content.
Implementation Process
Step 1: Gather Requirements
Ask user (if not provided):
- Workflow name: kebab-case identifier (e.g.,
feature-implementation) - Description: What the workflow accomplishes
- Steps: List of discrete steps with:
- Step name
- Step goal
- Required tools
- Expected output
- Execution mode: Sequential or parallel steps
- Agent type:
general-purposeor custom agent
Step 2: Create Directory Structure
# Create tasks directory (if it doesn't exist)
mkdir -p ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks
# Optional: Create agents directory (if using custom agents)
mkdir -p ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents
Note: All task files (both workflow-specific steps and shared context) are placed directly in tasks/ without subdirectories.
Step 3: Create Task Files
For each step, create a task file with this structure:
# Step N: <Step Name>
## Context
You are executing step N of the <workflow-name> workflow.
## Goal
<Clear, specific goal for this step>
## Input
<What this step receives from previous steps or user>
## Instructions
1. <Specific action>
2. <Specific action>
3. <Specific action>
## Constraints
- <Limitation or boundary>
- <What NOT to do>
## Expected Output
<What to return to orchestrator>
## Success Criteria
- [ ] <Measurable outcome>
- [ ] <Measurable outcome>
Step 4: Create Orchestrator Command
Create the main command file with this pattern:
---
description: <Workflow description>
argument-hint: <Required arguments>
allowed-tools: Task, Read
model: sonnet
---
# <Workflow Name>
## User Input
\`\`\`text
$ARGUMENTS
\`\`\`
## Workflow Execution
### Step 1: <Step Name>
Launch general-purpose agent:
- **Description**: "<3-5 word summary>"
- **Prompt**:
\`\`\`
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1-<workflow>-<name>.md and execute.
Context:
- TARGET: $1
- MODE: $2
\`\`\`
**Capture**: <What to extract from result>
### Step 2: <Step Name>
Launch general-purpose agent:
- **Description**: "<3-5 word summary>"
- **Prompt**:
\`\`\`
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-2-<workflow>-<name>.md and execute.
Context from Step 1:
- <Key data from previous step>
\`\`\`
### Step 3: <Step Name>
[Continue pattern...]
## Completion
Summarize workflow results:
1. <What was accomplished>
2. <Key outputs>
3. <Next steps if any>
Frontmatter Options
| Field | Purpose | Default |
|---|---|---|
description | Brief description of workflow purpose | Required |
argument-hint | Expected arguments description | None |
allowed-tools | Tools the command can use | Inherits from conversation |
model | Specific Claude model (sonnet, opus, haiku) | Inherits from conversation |
Model selection:
haiku- Fast, efficient for simple workflowssonnet- Balanced performance (recommended default)opus- Maximum capability for complex orchestration
Execution Patterns
Pattern A: Sequential Steps (Default)
Each step depends on previous step's output:
### Step 1: Analyze
Launch agent → Get analysis result
### Step 2: Plan (uses Step 1 result)
Launch agent with Step 1 context → Get plan
### Step 3: Execute (uses Step 2 result)
Launch agent with Step 2 context → Complete
Pattern B: Parallel Independent Steps
Steps can run concurrently:
### Analysis Phase (Parallel)
Launch 3 agents simultaneously:
1. Agent 1: Security analysis → Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1a-security.md
2. Agent 2: Performance analysis → Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1b-performance.md
3. Agent 3: Code quality analysis → Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1c-quality.md
**Wait for all**, then consolidate results.
### Synthesis Phase
Launch agent with all analysis results...
Pattern C: Stateful Multi-Step (Resume)
When steps need shared context:
### Step 1: Initialize
Launch agent, **capture agent_id**
### Step 2: Continue (same context)
Resume agent using agent_id:
- **resume**: <agent_id from Step 1>
- **prompt**: "Proceed to phase 2: <additional instructions>"
Example: Feature Implementation Workflow
Orchestrator Command
---
description: Execute feature implementation through research, planning, and coding phases
argument-hint: [feature-description]
allowed-tools: Task, Read, TodoWrite
model: sonnet
---
# Implement Feature
## User Input
\`\`\`text
$ARGUMENTS
\`\`\`
Create TodoWrite with workflow steps.
## Phase 1: Research
Launch general-purpose agent:
- **Description**: "Research feature requirements"
- **Prompt**:
\`\`\`
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-1-feature-impl-research.md
Feature: $ARGUMENTS
\`\`\`
**Extract**: Key findings, constraints, existing patterns
## Phase 2: Architecture
Launch general-purpose agent:
- **Description**: "Design feature architecture"
- **Prompt**:
\`\`\`
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-2-feature-impl-architecture.md
Feature: $ARGUMENTS
Research findings: <summary from Phase 1>
\`\`\`
**Extract**: File structure, components, interfaces
## Phase 3: Implementation
Launch developer agent:
- **Description**: "Implement feature code"
- **Prompt**:
\`\`\`
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/step-3-feature-impl-implement.md
Architecture: <summary from Phase 2>
\`\`\`
## Completion
Mark todos complete. Report:
1. Files created/modified
2. Tests added
3. Remaining work
Task File Example (step-1-feature-impl-research.md)
# Step 1: Feature Research
## Context
You are the research phase of a feature implementation workflow.
## Goal
Thoroughly understand the feature requirements and existing codebase context before any implementation begins.
## Instructions
1. **Parse Feature Request**
- Extract core requirements
- Identify acceptance criteria
- Note any constraints mentioned
2. **Codebase Analysis**
- Search for similar existing features
- Identify relevant patterns and conventions
- Find reusable components/utilities
3. **Dependency Check**
- What existing code will this feature interact with?
- Are there breaking change risks?
- What tests exist for related functionality?
4. **Gap Analysis**
- What's missing from the request?
- What clarifications might be needed?
- What edge cases should be considered?
## Constraints
- Do NOT write any implementation code
- Do NOT modify any files
- Focus purely on research and analysis
## Expected Output
Return a structured research summary:
\`\`\`markdown
## Feature Understanding
- Core requirement: <summary>
- Acceptance criteria: <list>
## Codebase Context
- Similar features: <list with file paths>
- Patterns to follow: <list>
- Reusable code: <list with file paths>
## Dependencies
- Files affected: <list>
- Tests to consider: <list>
## Open Questions
- <Question 1>
- <Question 2>
## Recommendation
<Brief recommendation for architecture phase>
\`\`\`
## Success Criteria
- [ ] Feature requirements clearly articulated
- [ ] Relevant existing code identified
- [ ] No implementation attempted
- [ ] Clear handoff to architecture phase
Known Limitations
| Limitation | Impact | Workaround |
|---|---|---|
| No nested sub-agents | Sub-agents can't spawn Task tool | Keep all orchestration in main command |
| No skill auto-loading | Sub-agents don't trigger skills | Pass explicit file paths or inline context |
| Fresh context per agent | Each dispatch starts empty | Use resume pattern OR pass summaries |
| File read latency | Extra tool call per step | Acceptable trade-off for context savings |
Validation Checklist
Before finalizing workflow command:
- Each step has clear, specific goal
- Task files are self-contained (sub-agent doesn't need external context)
- File paths use
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}for portability - Context passed between steps is minimal (summaries, not full data)
- Orchestrator command stays lean (<100 tokens per step dispatch)
- Error handling defined for step failures
- Success criteria measurable for each step
Create the Workflow
Based on user input, create:
-
Directories:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tasks/- All task files directly here${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/agents/- (Optional) Custom agent definitions
-
Task files: Create in
tasks/directory with naming patternstep-N-<workflow>-<name>.md- Example:
step-1-feature-impl-research.md - Example:
step-2-feature-impl-architecture.md - Shared context:
common-context.mddirectly intasks/
- Example:
-
Orchestrator command: Lean dispatch logic in
commands/<workflow-name>.md -
Custom agents (Optional): If workflow needs specialized agent behavior in
agents/ -
Update plugin.json: Add command to plugin manifest if needed
After creation, suggest testing with /customaize-agent:test-prompt command.
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit/create-workflow-command">View create-workflow-command on skillZs</a>