rebuttal-writing
Write point-by-point rebuttals to reviewer comments. Extract concerns from reviews, generate evidence-based responses, and format as a structured rebuttal document. Use after receiving peer review feedback.
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/lingzhi227/agent-research-skills --skill rebuttal-writingIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
The skill is a text-processing utility designed to assist authors in responding to academic peer reviews. It is functionally safe as it contains no executable scripts, network connectivity, or system command capabilities. A minor risk of indirect prompt injection exists because the skill processes untrusted text (reviewer comments), but this is mitigated by the skill's lack of any dangerous capabilities.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykpass
Risk: LOW · No issues
- Runlayerwarn
1/2 files flagged
- ZeroLeakspass
Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed
What does this agent skill do?
Rebuttal Writing
Generate structured, evidence-based rebuttals to peer review comments.
Input
$0— Reviewer comments (text file, or pasted directly)- Optional: current paper draft for reference
References
- Rebuttal prompts and format templates:
~/.claude/skills/rebuttal-writing/references/rebuttal-prompts.md
Workflow
Step 1: Parse Review Comments
For each reviewer:
- Extract individual concerns/questions/weaknesses
- Categorize each: major concern, minor concern, question, suggestion
- Identify the core issue behind each concern
Step 2: Generate Responses
For each concern:
- Acknowledge the reviewer's point
- Respond with evidence — cite specific sections, equations, experiments, or results from the paper
- Describe what was done (not what will be done) — "We have added...", "Our experiments show..."
- If additional experiments are needed, describe the new results concretely
Step 3: Format Rebuttal
Use the standard rebuttal format:
# Response to Reviewers
We thank all reviewers for their constructive feedback. We address each concern below.
## Reviewer #1
**Concern #1:** [extracted concern]
**Author Response:** [detailed response with evidence]
**Concern #2:** [extracted concern]
**Author Response:** [detailed response with evidence]
## Reviewer #2
...
Step 4: Summary of Changes
Add a brief summary at the top listing all major changes made to the paper:
- New experiments added
- Sections revised
- Clarifications made
Rules
- Reply with what was done, not what will be done — "We have conducted additional experiments" not "We will conduct..."
- Be specific — Reference exact sections, table numbers, equation numbers
- Be respectful — Thank reviewers, acknowledge valid concerns
- Address every concern — Do not skip any reviewer point
- Provide evidence — Every response should include concrete data, citations, or reasoning
- Keep responses concise — Detailed enough to address the concern, but not padded
- Highlight changes — When referring to modified text, use blue text or clearly mark revisions
Related Skills
- Upstream: self-review, paper-revision
- Downstream: paper-compilation
- See also: data-analysis
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/lingzhi227/agent-research-skills/rebuttal-writing">View rebuttal-writing on skillZs</a>