skillZs
LIVE SKILL TAGS
>>> LIVE SKILLS INDEX <<<
* OPEN SOURCE *
NO LOGIN, NO TRACKING
REAL INSTALL DATA
← back to all skills
lingzhi227/agent-research-skills1.2k installs

novelty-assessment

Assess research idea novelty through systematic literature search. Multi-round search-evaluate loops with harsh critic persona. Binary novel/not-novel decision with justification. Use before committing to a research direction.

How do I install this agent skill?

npx skills add https://github.com/lingzhi227/agent-research-skills --skill novelty-assessment
view source ↗

Is this agent skill safe to install?

  • Gen Agent Trust Hubpass

    The skill is a specialized tool for academic research assessment. It safely uses local scripts to query reputable academic databases like Semantic Scholar and arXiv. While it is theoretically susceptible to indirect prompt injection from the content of research papers it processes, this is a standard risk for information retrieval tasks and does not pose a direct threat to the user or system integrity.

  • Socketpass

    No alerts

  • Snykwarn

    Risk: MEDIUM · No issues

  • Runlayerpass

    2 files scanned · No issues

What does this agent skill do?

Novelty Assessment

Rigorously assess whether a research idea is novel through systematic literature search.

Input

  • $0 — Research idea description, title, or JSON file

Scripts

Automated novelty check

python ~/.claude/skills/idea-generation/scripts/novelty_check.py \
  --idea "Your research idea description" \
  --max-rounds 10 --output novelty_report.json

Literature search

python ~/.claude/skills/deep-research/scripts/search_semantic_scholar.py \
  --query "relevant search query" --max-results 10

References

  • Assessment prompts and criteria: ~/.claude/skills/novelty-assessment/references/assessment-prompts.md

Workflow

Step 1: Understand the Idea

  • Identify the core contribution
  • List the key technical components
  • Determine the research area and subfield

Step 2: Multi-Round Literature Search (up to 10 rounds)

For each round:

  1. Generate a targeted search query
  2. Search Semantic Scholar / arXiv / OpenAlex
  3. Review top-10 results with abstracts
  4. Assess overlap with the idea
  5. Decide: need more searching, or ready to decide

Step 3: Make Decision

  • Novel: After sufficient searching, no paper significantly overlaps
  • Not Novel: Found a paper that significantly overlaps

Step 4: Position the Idea

If novel, identify:

  • Most similar existing papers (for Related Work)
  • How the idea differs from each
  • The specific gap this idea fills

Harsh Critic Persona

Be a harsh critic for novelty. Ensure there is a sufficient contribution
for a new conference or workshop paper. A trivial extension of existing
work is NOT novel. The idea must offer a meaningfully different approach,
formulation, or insight.

Output Format

{
  "decision": "novel" | "not_novel",
  "confidence": "high" | "medium" | "low",
  "justification": "After searching X rounds...",
  "most_similar_papers": [
    {"title": "...", "year": 2024, "overlap": "..."}
  ],
  "differentiation": "Our idea differs because..."
}

Rules

  • Minimum 3 search rounds before declaring novel
  • Try to recall exact paper names for targeted queries
  • A paper idea is NOT novel if it's a trivial extension
  • Consider both methodology novelty AND application novelty
  • Check for concurrent/recent arXiv submissions

Related Skills

Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.

<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/lingzhi227/agent-research-skills/novelty-assessment">View novelty-assessment on skillZs</a>