skillZs
★ LIVE SKILL TAGS ★
>>> LIVE SKILLS INDEX <<<
* OPEN SOURCE *
NO LOGIN, NO TRACKING
※ REAL INSTALL DATA ※
← back to all skills
everyinc/compound-writing96 installs

cw-emergent

Compose existing Compound Writing skills and runtime capabilities for open-ended writing outcomes that no single skill covers, such as cross-draft analysis, source-to-outline comparison, or multi-pass revision.

How do I install this agent skill?

npx skills add https://github.com/everyinc/compound-writing --skill cw-emergent
view source ↗

Is this agent skill safe to install?

  • Gen Agent Trust Hubpass

    The skill establishes a meta-framework for the agent to compose and chain existing writing tools to handle complex, multi-step requests. It focuses on orchestration and planning without introducing malicious code or unauthorized access.

  • Socketpass

    No alerts

  • Snykpass

    Risk: LOW · No issues

What does this agent skill do?

Emergent Capability

Purpose

Enable the agent to handle requests that don't map directly to a specific skill by composing primitives and existing skills into novel solutions.

This is what makes the system agent-native: the ability to figure out how to accomplish an outcome, not just execute predefined workflows.

Read ../../references/context-contract.md before composing a multi-artifact workflow. Respect the active project's source-of-truth files, provenance, destinations, and approval rules.

When This Applies

Use emergent composition when:

  • Request spans multiple drafts or files
  • Request requires pattern analysis across the body of work
  • Request combines multiple types of feedback
  • No single skill handles the full request
  • User describes an outcome, not a command

Do NOT use when:

  • A skill directly handles the request (use the skill)
  • The request is a simple file operation
  • The user invokes a specific command

The Composition Loop

When a request doesn't map to a skill:

  1. Understand the outcome

    • What does success look like?
    • What would the user see/know when this is done?
  2. Identify capabilities needed

    • What artifacts must be found, read, compared, or revised?
    • What maintained context or connected source must be loaded?
    • What draft, source, or destination operations are authorized?
    • What analysis operations? (compare, analyze voice, check AI)
  3. Identify skills that help

    • Which existing skills apply to parts of the request?
    • Can skills be chained for the full solution?
  4. Compose a solution

    • Chain primitives and skills together
    • Plan the sequence of operations
  5. Execute in a loop

    • Work through the plan
    • Adapt if something unexpected comes up
    • Continue until outcome achieved or blocked
  6. Report results

    • Summarize what was found/done
    • Offer next steps if applicable

Example Requests and Approaches

RequestPrimitivesSkillsApproach
"Compare voice in my last 3 drafts"Find and read the relevant piecescw-voice-checkAnalyze each against the same live voice sources, then compare
"Find patterns in my hooks"Find and read the relevant pieces—Extract openings, classify moves, and report with examples
"What objections keep coming up?"Read the relevant drafts and reviewscw-objectionsCompare repeated resistance and distinguish writer pattern from topic pattern
"Am I overusing certain transitions?"Search the requested corpuscw-transitionCount, inspect context, and report only meaningful repetition
"Make this article better"Load the draft, brief, voice, and sourcescw-dev-edit, cw-line-edit, cw-ai-checkDiagnose, revise, then validate
"Help me finish this piece"Inspect the active artifact and open decisionsvariesRoute to the smallest unfinished outcome
"Cross-reference notes with outline"Read both authoritative artifacts—Compare claims, examples, sources, and omissions

Judgment: When to Compose

Good candidates for composition:

  • "Compare X across Y" — Analysis pattern
  • "Find patterns in Z" — Discovery pattern
  • "Check if A matches B" — Validation pattern
  • "Make this better" — Improvement pattern
  • "Help me with X" (vague) — Needs investigation first

Not good candidates:

  • "Give me a hook" → Use /cw-hook directly
  • "Does this bury the lede?" → Use /cw-bluf directly
  • "Check my voice" → Use /cw-voice-check directly
  • "Run the nemesis read" → Use /cw-nemesis directly

The Ultimate Test

Can the agent accomplish tasks you didn't explicitly design for?

Example: User asks "Cross-reference my meeting notes with my task list and tell me what I've committed to but haven't scheduled."

This wasn't designed as a feature. But if the agent can:

  1. Read the meeting notes
  2. Read the task list
  3. Extract commitments from notes
  4. Compare against tasks
  5. Report the gaps

...then it's agent-native.

Failure Modes

If composition fails:

  • Missing capability or access: Report what is unavailable
  • Skill not available: Suggest manual alternative
  • Too complex: Break into smaller requests
  • Ambiguous: Ask for clarification

Never say "I don't have a feature for that" when composition could work.

Reporting Results

When composition completes, report:

  1. What was requested
  2. What was done (briefly)
  3. What was found/achieved
  4. Suggested next steps (if applicable)

Keep reports focused on insights, not process details.

Lessons

[Skill-specific lessons will be added here as they're captured]

Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.

<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/everyinc/compound-writing/cw-emergent">View cw-emergent on skillZs</a>