fusion-backend-dev
Guides consumption and understanding of Fusion backend services, APIs, and patterns for frontend/client developers, integrators, and architects. Shows reference implementations, explains architectural decisions, and clarifies contracts. USE FOR: understanding Fusion backend APIs, learning implementation patterns, exploring reference code, choosing the right integration point, and understanding authorization/validation/async patterns. DO NOT USE FOR: modifying backend services, creating new endpoints, database changes, or backend-specific development (use the fusion-services-developer agent or the target backend service repo instead).
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/equinor/fusion-skills --skill fusion-backend-devIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
The skill is a comprehensive documentation and reference guide for developers consuming Fusion backend services at Equinor. It provides patterns for API contracts, authorization, validation, and integration without any detected security risks.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykwarn
Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue
What does this agent skill do?
Fusion Backend Consumption
When to use
Use when needing to understand Fusion backend services, available APIs, integration patterns, or architectural decisions.
Typical triggers:
- "How do I call the People API?"
- "Show an example of how the authorization pattern works"
- "What's the contract for the Org service?"
- "How do services handle validation errors?"
- "What async/messaging patterns does Fusion use?"
- "Can I see a reference implementation of a CQRS handler?"
- "How do services integrate with external APIs?"
- "What authentication/authorization requirements do I need?"
- "Show how events flow through the system"
- "What's the pattern for cross-service calls?"
- "How should I structure my API client?"
- "Where should I call the Context API?"
- "What's the difference between a command and a query in Fusion?"
Implicit triggers:
- Building frontend/client app needing to understand backend contracts
- Integrating with Fusion APIs and need patterns
- Designing architecture needing backend best practices
- Learning from existing Fusion service implementations
When not to use
- Creating or modifying backend services — use service-specific repo skill
- Adding new endpoints or API operations — backend development
- Database schema changes or migrations — backend development
- Authorization requirement definitions — backend development (this skill shows what exists, not new requirements)
- Pure architecture discussions without code references — use
fusion-researchor ADR-focused skills - Selecting between Fusion Framework alternatives — use
fusion-researchorfusion-app-react-dev
Required inputs
Mandatory
- What you're trying to do: clear description of integration point, use case, or pattern
- Your role/context: building a frontend app? Integrating externally? Designing architecture?
Conditional
- When comparing patterns: which two options you're deciding between
- When consuming an API: what operation/scenario (CRUD, async, real-time, etc.)
- When integrating: external system name and direction of flow (calling out vs being called)
Instructions
Step 1 — Clarify consumption context
Before searching for code, understand what you need:
- Integration point: Calling a backend API? Reading event messages? Implementing a webhook? Integrating with external system?
- Your boundaries: Frontend developer? Backend developer in another service? External integrator? Architect?
- Scope: Single API contract? Full pattern? Reference implementation? Architectural tradeoffs?
Use assets/follow-up-questions.md if user intent is unclear.
Step 2 — Search for reference implementation
Use mcp_fusion_search_backend_code to locate existing patterns:
- Call with high-level intent: "How People service exposes authorization" or "Cross-service API integration patterns"
- Start with
top: 3-5results - Capture
metadata.repository,metadata.service,metadata.filePath - Extract minimal code snippets showing the pattern (method signature, type contract, authorization check)
- If results are unclear, refine once:
- Add specific service name or interface
- Narrow to specific layer (controller, handler, client interface)
- Try a different phrase focusing on outcome rather than implementation details
Step 3 — Explain the pattern
Use evidence from Step 2:
- State the pattern clearly: What does the service do? What contract does it expose?
- Show the reference code: Quote relevant snippet with file path and line range
- Explain the constraints: Preconditions? Authorization? Error handling? Async behavior?
- Relate to your use case: How to apply this pattern?
- Surface tradeoffs or alternatives if they exist
Step 4 — Verify completeness
Before ending, check:
- User understands the contract (inputs, outputs, errors)
- User sees a real code reference (not invented)
- User knows where the code lives (repository, service, file path)
- User knows prerequisites (authentication, configuration, dependencies)
- User has enough context to implement or integrate
If uncertainty remains, flag it explicitly.
Reference guides
See references/ for deeper pattern documentation:
api-contracts.md— Fusion service API contracts and versioningauthorization-patterns.md— Authentication, authorization requirements, role-based accessvalidation-patterns.md— Input validation, error responses, business rulesasync-patterns.md— Events, service bus, domain notifications, eventual consistencyintegration-patterns.md— Cross-service calls, external APIs, webhook handlingcqrs-reference.md— CQRS handlers, commands, queries, notifications structure
Assets
assets/follow-up-questions.md— Clarifying questions for ambiguous requestsreferences/integration-patterns.md— Common integration scenarios and which patterns apply
Safety & constraints
Never:
- Describe real backend API behavior as fact unless verifiable in retrieved source code or cited repo docs
- Claim a pattern exists when search returns no evidence
- Present illustrative pseudo-code as retrieved source code
- Suggest modifying a backend service — that's out of scope
Always:
- Label illustrative examples as examples/pseudo-code when explanatory rather than retrieved
- Capture and cite repository, file path, and line references for real code
- State which repository the pattern comes from
- Note when a pattern exists in one service but not others
- Offer to escalate to the
fusion-services-developeragent if user wants to implement changes - For setting up or deploying a new standalone backend API (app registration, Roles V2, database, Radix/Kubernetes deployment, observability), point to the New Backend Service Checklist on fusion-docs rather than improvising the sequence
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/equinor/fusion-skills/fusion-backend-dev">View fusion-backend-dev on skillZs</a>