regression-suite
Map test coverage to GDD critical paths, find fixed bugs lacking regression tests, flag drift from new features.
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios --skill regression-suiteIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
The skill is generally safe and focuses on mapping test coverage to design documents. It possesses an indirect prompt injection surface as it processes external documentation and bug reports, and it uses a project-specific bash script to resolve its configuration at load time.
- Socketwarn
1 alert: gptAnomaly
- Snykpass
Risk: LOW · No issues
- ZeroLeakspass
2 findings · Score: 80/100
What does this agent skill do?
!bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/yaml-helper.sh" resolve_config --keys automation,workflow,qa.level,system_overrides
Resolved above — use as-is. No block → defaults in
.claude/docs/config-resolution.md.
Regression Suite
This skill ensures that every bug fix is backed by a test that would have caught the original bug — and that the regression suite stays current as the game evolves. It also detects when new features have been added without corresponding regression coverage.
A regression suite is not a new test category — it is a curated list of
tests already in tests/ that collectively cover the game's critical paths
and known failure points. This skill maintains that list.
Output: tests/regression-suite.md
When to run:
- After fixing a bug (confirm a regression test was written or identify gap)
- Before a phase gate — at
qa.level: full,/gate-checkrequires a regression suite - As part of sprint close to detect coverage drift
Every AskUserQuestion call follows .claude/docs/automation-modes.md
(collaborative asks always · guided major-only · autonomous logs and proceeds;
automation_always_ask categories always prompt).
Workflow tier: modes.workflow as resolved above — supplied by modes.rigor
unless set explicitly — per .claude/docs/workflow-modes.md; in audit mode consider
workflow_overrides.system_overrides.<system> per system as each GDD is read. It
sets whether GDD critical paths are mapped or coverage is smoke-only — see Step 2c.
qa.level: controls whether the suite is generated at
all. At minimal, the regression suite is not generated (report that and
stop); at standard, generate it at Polish-stage entry; at full, at
Production-stage entry. Distinct axis from workflow.
1. Parse Arguments
Early qa.level guard (resolved above): if qa.level: minimal, the
regression suite is not generated — report "Regression suite not generated at
qa.level minimal" and STOP here, before any scan, in every mode
(update / audit / report). This is the qa.level axis; it is distinct from
the workflow-tier minimal branch in Step 2c (which only changes the
critical-path source, not whether the suite runs). Do not enter Step 2c's
minimal branch on account of qa.level. This stop's verdict is
NOT ASSESSED (Section 7) — tests are not required at this level, and nothing
was scanned.
Modes:
/regression-suite update— scan new bug fixes this sprint and check for regression test presence; add new tests to the suite manifest/regression-suite audit— full audit of all GDD critical paths vs. existing test coverage; flag paths with no regression test/regression-suite report— read-only status report (no writes); suitable for sprint reviews- No argument — if a sprint is clearly active (sprint plan exists with in-progress stories), run
update. If ambiguous or no active sprint is detected, useAskUserQuestion:- Prompt: "No subcommand specified. Which mode do you want to run?"
- Options:
[A] update — scan new bug fixes this sprint and add missing regression tests[B] audit — full audit of all GDD critical paths vs. existing test coverage[C] report — read-only status report (no writes)
2. Load Context
Step 2a — Load existing regression suite
Read tests/regression-suite.md if it exists. Extract:
- Total registered regression tests
- Last updated date
- Any tests flagged as
STALEorQUARANTINED
If it does not exist: note "No regression suite found — will create one."
Step 2b — Load test inventory
Glob all test files:
tests/unit/**/*_test.*
tests/integration/**/*_test.*
tests/regression/**/*
For each file, note the system (from directory path) and file name. Do not read test file contents unless needed for name-to-test mapping.
Step 2c — Load GDD critical paths
For audit mode: read design/gdd/systems-index.md to get all systems, then
scope the scan by each system's workflow tier (resolved above):
full— read the GDD and map critical paths from all sections.standard— same, from the required sections (Acceptance Criteria, Edge Cases, and Formulas where the system defines numeric rules). A system pinned higher viasystem_overridesis mapped at its higher tier.minimal— skip the GDD critical-path scan. Instead read the latest smoke-check report inproduction/qa/smoke-*.mdand take the critical paths it exercises as the regression scope (Step 3 maps coverage against those, not GDD acceptance criteria). If no smoke report exists, stop with Verdict: NOT ASSESSED — no smoke report to take critical paths from — there is no critical-path source at minimal without one; run/smoke-checkfirst.
(Tier affects audit mode only; update and report modes are tier-independent.)
For each in-scope MVP-tier system's GDD, extract:
- Acceptance Criteria (these define the critical paths)
- Formulas section (formulas must have regression tests)
- Edge Cases section (known edge cases should have regression tests)
For update mode: skip full GDD scan. Instead read the current sprint plan
and story files to find stories with Status: Complete this sprint.
Step 2d — Load closed bugs
Glob production/qa/bugs/*.md and filter for bugs with a Status: Closed
or Status: Fixed field. Note:
- Which story or system the bug was in
- Whether a regression test was mentioned in the fix description
3. Map Coverage — Critical Paths
For audit mode only. (At minimal the critical paths come from the smoke-check
report identified in Step 2c, not from GDD acceptance criteria — map coverage
against those smoke paths and skip the GDD-criterion loop below.)
For each GDD acceptance criterion, determine whether a test exists:
- Grep
tests/unit/[system]/andtests/integration/[system]/for file names and function names related to the criterion's key noun/verb - Assign coverage:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| COVERED | A test file exists that targets this criterion's logic |
| PARTIAL | A test exists but doesn't cover all cases (e.g. happy path only) |
| MISSING | No test found for this critical path |
| EXEMPT | Visual/Feel or UI criterion — not automatable by design |
- Elevate MISSING items that correspond to formulas or state machines to HIGH PRIORITY gap — these are the most likely regression sources.
4. Map Coverage — Fixed Bugs
For each closed bug:
- Extract the system slug from the bug's metadata
- Grep
tests/unit/[system]/andtests/integration/[system]/for a test that references the bug ID or the specific failure scenario - Assign:
- HAS REGRESSION TEST — a test was found that would catch this bug
- MISSING REGRESSION TEST — bug was fixed but no test guards against recurrence
For MISSING REGRESSION TEST items:
- Flag them as regression gaps
- Suggest the test file path:
tests/unit/[system]/[bug-slug]_regression_test.[ext] - Note: "Without this test, this bug can silently return in a future sprint."
5. Detect Coverage Drift
Coverage drift occurs when the game grows but the regression suite doesn't.
Check for drift indicators:
- Stories completed this sprint with no corresponding test files in
tests/ - New systems added to
systems-index.mdsince the last regression-suite update - GDD sections added or revised since the regression suite was last updated (use Grep on GDD file modification hints if available, or ask the user)
tests/regression-suite.mdlast-updated date vs. current date — if gap > 2 sprints, flag as likely stale
6. Generate Report and Suite Manifest
Report format (in conversation)
## Regression Suite Status
**Mode**: [update | audit | report]
**Existing registered tests**: [N]
**Test files scanned**: [N]
### Critical Path Coverage (audit mode only)
| System | Total ACs | Covered | Partial | Missing | Exempt |
|--------|-----------|---------|---------|---------|--------|
| [name] | [N] | [N] | [N] | [N] | [N] |
**Coverage rate (non-exempt)**: [N]%
### Bug Regression Coverage
| Bug ID | System | Severity | Has Regression Test? |
|--------|--------|----------|----------------------|
| BUG-NNNN | [system] | S[N] | YES / NO ⚠ |
**Bugs without regression tests**: [N]
### Coverage Drift Indicators
[List new systems or stories with no test coverage, or "None detected."]
### Recommended New Regression Tests
| Priority | System | Suggested Test File | Covers |
|----------|--------|---------------------|--------|
| HIGH | [system] | `tests/unit/[system]/[slug]_regression_test.[ext]` | BUG-NNNN / AC-[N] |
| MEDIUM | [system] | `tests/unit/[system]/[slug]_test.[ext]` | [criterion] |
Suite manifest format (tests/regression-suite.md)
Before computing coverage, check the denominator. If the GDD glob returns zero critical paths, or the test globs return zero test files, do not emit a percentage — report
Coverage: NOT ASSESSED — [no GDDs found | no test files found]and name which side was empty and the skill that produces it (/map-systemsand/design-systemfor GDDs,/test-setupfor the test scaffold).A percentage computed from an empty denominator is not a low score; it is not a number.
0%reads as "measured and terrible" and100%as "measured and perfect" — both are claims about a comparison that never happened. This is the same defect/scope-checkcarries a Phase 4 guard against, in the same words: "a percentage computed from no baseline items is not a small number; it is not a number."A hand-written list of skills required to carry
NOT ASSESSEDpins what was known when it was written, so a skill added later inherits no obligation and nothing notices. Derive that set rather than enumerating it.
The manifest is a curated index — not the tests themselves, but a registry of which tests should always pass before a release:
# Regression Suite Manifest
> Last Updated: [date]
> Total registered tests: [N]
> Coverage: [N]% of GDD critical paths
## How to run
[Engine-specific command to run all regression tests]
## Registered Regression Tests
### [System Name]
| Test File | Test Function (if known) | Covers | Added |
|-----------|--------------------------|--------|-------|
| `tests/unit/[system]/[file]_test.[ext]` | `test_[scenario]` | AC-N / BUG-NNNN | [date] |
## Known Gaps
Tests that should exist but don't yet:
| Priority | System | Suggested Path | Covers | Reason Not Yet Written |
|----------|--------|----------------|--------|------------------------|
| HIGH | [system] | `tests/unit/[system]/[path]` | BUG-NNNN | Bug fixed without test |
## Quarantined Tests
Tests that are flaky or disabled (do not run in CI):
| Test File | Function | Reason | Quarantined Since |
|-----------|----------|--------|-------------------|
| (none) | | | |
7. Write Output
In update or audit mode, ask: "May I write/update tests/regression-suite.md with the current
regression suite manifest?"
For update mode: append new entries; never remove existing entries
(use Edit with targeted insertions).
For audit mode: rewrite the full manifest with updated coverage data.
For report mode: do not write anything.
After writing (if approved):
- For each HIGH priority gap: "Consider creating the missing regression test
before the next sprint. Run
/test-helpersto scaffold the test file." - If bug regression gaps > 0: "These bugs can silently return without regression tests. The next sprint should include a story to write the missing tests."
- If coverage drift detected: "Regression suite may be drifting. Consider
running
/regression-suite auditat the next sprint boundary."
Verdict, first match wins:
- NOT ASSESSED — the Section 1 stop at
qa.level: minimal: "Regression suite not generated at qa.level minimal". Tests are not required at this level; nothing was scanned or written. - NOT ASSESSED — the
minimalstop above: no smoke report to take critical paths from; name/smoke-checkas the fix. - NOT ASSESSED — coverage came back
Coverage: NOT ASSESSED — [reason](no GDDs or no test files); name the reason. Never report COMPLETE over a coverage figure that was not computed. - BLOCKED —
updateorauditmode and the user declined the write. - COMPLETE —
update/audit: regression suite updated;report: coverage report shown (report mode writes nothing).
Collaborative Protocol
Applies in collaborative mode (the default). For guided and
autonomous modes, see .claude/docs/automation-modes.md — the rules below
describe what collaborative mode requires, not universal behavior.
- Never remove existing regression tests from the manifest without explicit user approval — removing a test that was deliberately written is a regression risk itself
- Gaps are advisory, not blocking — surface them clearly but do not prevent
other work from proceeding (except at
qa.level: full, where phase gates require the regression suite) - Quarantine is not deletion — tests with intermittent failures should be
quarantined (noted in manifest) but not removed; they should be fixed by
/test-flakiness - Ask before writing — always confirm before creating or updating the manifest
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/regression-suite">View regression-suite on skillZs</a>