better-result-adopt

better-result Adopt

Adopt better-result incrementally in existing codebases without rewriting everything at once.

When to Use

Use this skill when the user wants to:

• migrate from try/catch to Result.try or Result.tryPromise
• replace nullable return values with typed Result<T, E>
• define domain-specific TaggedError types
• refactor nested error handling into andThen chains or Result.gen
• standardize error handling across a service or module

Reading Order

Task	Files to Read
Adopt better-result in a module	This file
Define or review error types	references/tagged-errors.md
Inspect library implementation details	opensrc/ if present

Prerequisites

Before editing code:

1. Confirm better-result is already installed in the target project.
2. Check for an opensrc/ directory. If present, read the package source there for current patterns.
3. Identify the migration scope first: one file, one module, or one boundary layer.

Migration Strategy

1. Start at boundaries

Begin with I/O boundaries and exception-heavy code:

• HTTP clients
• database access
• file system operations
• parsing and validation
• framework adapters

Do not convert the whole codebase at once.

2. Classify existing failures

Category	Examples	Target shape
Domain errors	not found, validation, auth	TaggedError + Result.err
Infrastructure errors	network, DB, file I/O	Result.tryPromise + mapped error
Programmer defects	bad assumptions, null deref	leave throwing; defects become Panic inside Result callbacks

3. Migrate in this order

1. Define error types.
2. Wrap throwing boundaries with Result.try / Result.tryPromise.
3. Replace null or boolean sentinel returns with Result.
4. Refactor call sites to propagate Result values.
5. Collapse nested branching into andThen, mapError, or Result.gen.

Core Transformations

Try/catch → Result.try

function parseConfig(json: string): Result<Config, ParseError> {
  return Result.try({
    try: () => JSON.parse(json) as Config,
    catch: (cause) => new ParseError({ cause, message: `Parse failed: ${cause}` }),
  });
}

Async throws → Result.tryPromise

async function fetchUser(id: string): Promise<Result<User, ApiError | UnhandledException>> {
  return Result.tryPromise({
    try: async () => {
      const res = await fetch(`/api/users/${id}`);
      if (!res.ok) throw new ApiError({ status: res.status, message: `API ${res.status}` });
      return res.json() as Promise<User>;
    },
    catch: (cause) => (cause instanceof ApiError ? cause : new UnhandledException({ cause })),
  });
}

Null sentinel → Result

function findUser(id: string): Result<User, NotFoundError> {
  const user = users.find((candidate) => candidate.id === id);
  return user
    ? Result.ok(user)
    : Result.err(new NotFoundError({ id, message: `User ${id} not found` }));
}

Nested flow → Result.gen

async function processOrder(orderId: string): Promise<Result<OrderResult, OrderError>> {
  return Result.gen(async function* () {
    const order = yield* Result.await(fetchOrder(orderId));
    const validated = yield* validateOrder(order);
    const result = yield* Result.await(submitOrder(validated));
    return Result.ok(result);
  });
}

Execution Workflow

1. Audit the target module for try, catch, .catch(...), throw, null, undefined, and status-flag error handling.
2. Define or update TaggedError classes before changing control flow.
3. Convert boundary functions first and change their signatures to Result<T, E> or Promise<Result<T, E>>.
4. Update immediate callers so they handle or propagate the new Result.
5. Where multiple Result-returning steps compose, use Result.gen or andThen.
6. Preserve error context by keeping cause, IDs, messages, and other structured fields.
7. Run tests and add coverage for both success and error paths.

Completion Criteria

A migration is complete when:

• target functions no longer rely on try/catch for expected domain failures
• nullable or sentinel error returns are replaced with explicit Result values
• domain failures use typed TaggedError classes
• callers either propagate Result or explicitly unwrap/match it
• tests cover at least one success path and one representative error path

Common Pitfalls

• Over-wrapping everything instead of starting at boundaries
• Losing original failure context when mapping errors
• Mixing throw-based and Result-based APIs deep in the same flow
• Catching Panic instead of fixing the underlying defect

In This Reference

File	Purpose
references/tagged-errors.md	TaggedError patterns, matching, type guards, and examples

If opensrc/ exists, treat it as the source of truth for implementation details and current API behavior.