tf-best-practices
Best-practice authoring guidance AND a read-only policy gate for AWS Terraform generated by a migration skill. Load during any phase that writes a terraform/ directory — first as the "what to emit" posture rules + security-baseline spec, then after writing as the deterministic policy verdict. Read-only: it reports whether the generated Terraform passes; it never edits .tf files, never touches .phase-status.json, and never decides phase completion. Complements (does not replace) terraform fmt/init/validate.
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/awslabs/startups --skill tf-best-practicesIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
This skill provides a static security policy engine for AWS Terraform code. It identifies security risks such as unencrypted databases, public load balancers, and overly permissive IAM policies without modifying the source files. The analysis found no evidence of malicious behavior, data exfiltration, or prompt injection vulnerabilities.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykpass
Risk: LOW · No issues
What does this agent skill do?
tf-best-practices — Generated-IaC posture rules + read-only policy gate
A shared authoring guide and verdict producer, not a workflow. It answers two questions for a phase that generates AWS Terraform:
- Before writing — "what security posture must the generated
terraform/follow?" (the posture rules + thebaseline.tfaccount-hardening spec) - After writing — "does the generated
terraform/pass policy?" (a deterministic, read-only verdict + a machine-readable report)
Routing — load the part that matches your context
This skill is entered at two touchpoints in the caller's Generate flow, with the caller's own terraform-authoring work in between. The caller states which touchpoint it is at when it loads this skill, and reads the corresponding part:
| Caller context | Load | Why |
|---|---|---|
About to author terraform/ (before writing) | Part 1 → references/security-posture-rules.md | The "what to emit" AWS authoring rules (gate-enforced + authoring-only + compliance-conditional). |
terraform/ written, ready to validate (after writing) | Part 2 → references/terraform-validation.md + run the gate script | The fmt → init → validate → policy protocol and the read-only verdict. |
Everything this skill states is source-cloud-agnostic (pure AWS Terraform). Any GCP/Heroku
detection or artifact reading is the caller's job; where a rule needs a caller-known fact (e.g.
declared compliance frameworks), the caller passes it as a caller-context signal — see
references/security-posture-rules.md § Caller-context signals.
Boundary (read this first)
This unit is a verdict producer, never a mutator. Its entire write surface is the JSON verdict it is asked to emit. Specifically it MUST NOT:
- edit, format, or rewrite any
.tffile (the caller owns remediation), - read or write
.phase-status.jsonor any run-state file (interpreter-owned), - decide whether a phase may complete, or prompt the user (caller policy).
The caller (a migration skill's Generate phase) owns: the fix-and-retry loop that edits
the .tf it generated, terraform fmt auto-apply, the retry/skip/abort prompt, the
Phase Completion gate, and every .phase-status.json write. See the consuming skill's
generate phase for how the verdict feeds those decisions.
Consumers:
gcp-to-aws(prose Generate) andheroku-to-aws(DSL Generate). The contract is source-agnostic; each caller wires the two touchpoints in its own Generate idiom — gcp-to-aws as prose steps, heroku-to-aws as a fragment step plus a fail-closed_postconditionsassert enforced by the interpreter.
Part 1 — Authoring posture (load before writing terraform/)
Emit generated Terraform that satisfies the posture in
references/security-posture-rules.md.
These are the "what good AWS Terraform looks like" rules. Following them makes the Part 2 gate pass by construction. This unit does not read the caller's artifacts — it consumes only caller-context signals the caller passes in.
Scope.
security-posture-rules.mdcovers, in three tiers:
- Gate-enforced (Part 2 verifies statically): ALB TLS, no-public-database, RDS + ElastiCache encryption-at-rest, no-public-DB-port ingress, no-public admin/datastore-port ingress, no-wildcard-IAM.
- Authoring-only (not gate-checkable, still required):
deletion_protection, master-password-via-Secrets-Manager, S3 hardening, Fargate/EKS/ECR settings, private-subnet placement, backups, baseline monitoring.- Compliance-conditional (emitted when the caller declares
soc2/pci/hipaa/fedramp): VPC flow logs, S3 access logging, secret rotation, customer-managed KMS.Still the caller's own generation concern (candidates to migrate here later): the account-hardening
baseline.tflayer (CloudTrail, GuardDuty, Config, Security Hub).
Part 2 — Policy gate (run after writing terraform/)
Run the read-only checker against the generated directory. Resolve the script path relative to
the plugin root ($PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/tf-best-practices/scripts/...), the same convention the
plugin uses for its other scripts:
python3 "$PLUGIN_ROOT/skills/tf-best-practices/scripts/validate-terraform-policy.py" "$TERRAFORM_DIR" --json "$VERDICT_PATH"
$TERRAFORM_DIR— required, caller-supplied: the generatedterraform/directory (e.g.$MIGRATION_DIR/terraform). This skill never defaults or discovers it — the caller always passes the path it wrote Terraform to.--json $VERDICT_PATH— optional; writes a machine-readable verdict the caller can merge into its ownvalidation-report.json.
The policy check is one stage of a larger validation flow (fmt → init → validate → policy).
The full protocol — including offline-fallback behavior and how the policy verdict maps into a
validation-report.json — is documented in
references/terraform-validation.md. That protocol is
descriptive: the caller owns the fmt/init/validate execution, the fix-and-retry loop, and
the report write; this unit contributes only the read-only policy stage + verdict shape.
Exit codes → caller action
| Exit | stdout | Meaning | Caller does |
|---|---|---|---|
0 | POLICY_OK | posture satisfied | proceed |
1 | POLICY_FAIL | violations present | read violations[], edit the named .tf sites, re-run (caller's retry budget) |
2 | (usage error) | bad path / IO | surface to user; do not treat as pass |
Verdict shape (--json)
{
"check": "policy",
"policy_status": "POLICY_OK | POLICY_FAIL",
"violations": [
{
"check": "policy",
"rule": "alb_https_listener | alb_http_redirect | no_tf_files",
"file": "compute.tf",
"line": 7,
"severity": "error",
"summary": "human-readable violation",
"fix_hint": "concrete remediation the caller can apply"
}
]
}
Each violations[] entry is actionable evidence — file + line + fix_hint tell the
caller exactly what to edit. The caller applies the edit; this unit only reports.
Policy rules enforced today
Every rule is fail-open on ambiguity — it fires only on unambiguous, in-block literal
evidence, so a valid stack is never falsely blocked (a POLICY_FAIL is a hard completion gate
for the caller, so a false positive would block a real migration).
Internet-facing ALB TLS posture (an ALB is internet-facing when internal is absent,
false, or variable-driven — fail-safe):
alb_https_listener— must have an HTTPS listener on443withcertificate_arnand aforwardaction.alb_http_redirect— an HTTP:80listener mustredirectto HTTPS, neverforwardto targets. Internal ALBs (internal = true) are exempt.
Elastic Beanstalk ALBs are invisible to these rules. The ALB rules inspect standalone
aws_lb_listenerblocks. An EB LoadBalanced environment provisions its ALB fromaws_elastic_beanstalk_environmentsettingblocks, which the static checker does not read — so a pure-EB design passes the ALB rules vacuously (no listener to inspect). EB listener/TLS posture is therefore authoring-only, not gate-enforced. (Fixturesgood-heroku-eb-onlyandgood-heroku-eb-singleinstancedocument this;good-heroku-eb-loadbalancedcarries a standalone ALB so the listener rules are exercised on real blocks.)
Managed database exposure & encryption (aws_db_instance, aws_rds_cluster):
rds_not_public— must not setpublicly_accessible = true(absent/variable → fail-open).rds_encryption_at_rest— must setstorage_encrypted = true; missing or literalfalsefires (RDS defaults to unencrypted), variable-driven fails open. S3 is not checked (default SSE-S3 since Jan 2023).
ElastiCache encryption (aws_elasticache_replication_group, Redis aws_elasticache_cluster):
elasticache_encryption_at_rest— a replication group must setat_rest_encryption_enabled = true; missing or literalfalsefires, variable-driven fails open.elasticache_cluster_encryption— a Redis-engineaws_elasticache_cluster(single-node:engine = "redis", noreplication_group_id) must set BOTHat_rest_encryption_enabled = trueandtransit_encryption_enabled = true; missing or literalfalseon either fires, variable-driven fails open.engine = "memcached"clusters (and variable-driven/absent engine) are exempt — Memcached does not support these attributes.
Security group ingress:
db_sg_no_public_ingress— an inlineaws_security_groupingress covering5432/3306must not allow0.0.0.0/0or::/0.sg_no_public_admin_ingress— an inline ingress must not open a curated never-public admin/datastore port (22,3389,6379,11211,27017,9200/9300,5601) to0.0.0.0/0or::/0. Web (80/443) and app/game ports are not flagged; DB ports are handled by the rule above. Both checkcidr_blocksandipv6_cidr_blocksindependently, so a benign IPv4 list does not mask an open IPv6 one. Both: separateaws_security_group_rule/aws_vpc_security_group_ingress_ruleresources fail open (not correlated).
IAM least-privilege (aws_iam_policy, aws_iam_role_policy, aws_iam_group_policy,
aws_iam_user_policy):
no_wildcard_iam— anAllowstatement must not useAction/Resource"*". The one narrow exception is an isolatedelasticbeanstalk:CreateStorageLocationstatement withResource = "*"because AWS does not support resource-level permissions for that action.aws_iam_policy_documentdata sources and assume-role trust policies fail open.
The checker is a zero-dependency static HCL reader (no
terraform init, no provider download) — it runs even when the registry is unreachable. It uses brace-depth matching for nested blocks, so a valid HTTPS listener written with a nestedforward { ... }block is not a false failure.
Fixtures (also the checker's regression suite)
fixtures/terraform-policy/ holds intentionally-shaped Terraform used by
scripts/test_validate_terraform_policy.py:
bad-http-forward/— internet-facing ALB that forwards plaintext HTTP → MUSTPOLICY_FAIL.internal-alb-only/— internal ALB on HTTP → MUSTPOLICY_OK(HTTP allowed internally).good-https-redirect/— the correct pattern →POLICY_OK.
These are deliberately non-compliant test data (never deployed). They are excluded from the
repo-wide checkov scan via .checkov.yaml skip-path; do not "harden" them — doing so
breaks the tests that assert the failure paths.
Verification
# from skills/tf-best-practices/
uv run --python 3.12 --with pytest python -m pytest scripts/test_validate_terraform_policy.py -q
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/awslabs/startups/tf-best-practices">View tf-best-practices on skillZs</a>