roadmap-planning
Create outcome-based roadmaps using Now/Next/Later instead of Gantt charts. Use when asked to create a roadmap, plan quarterly, organize milestones, or figure out what to build over the next few months. Anti-date, anti-feature-list, pro-outcome.
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/assimovt/productskills --skill roadmap-planningIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
No security issues were detected. The skill provides structured guidelines for outcome-based roadmap planning and mentions the author's GitHub repository for reference.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykpass
Risk: LOW · No issues
- Runlayerpass
1 file scanned · No issues
What does this agent skill do?
Build roadmaps organized by outcomes, not feature lists. A roadmap answers "what problems are we solving and in what order?" — not "what features will we ship and when?" Dates on a roadmap beyond 6 weeks are fiction. Treat them that way.
Now / Next / Later
Three time horizons, decreasing in certainty:
Now (Committed — this cycle)
- Currently in progress or about to start
- Fully shaped: problem defined, solution scoped, appetite set
- Team assigned, expected to ship this cycle
- 1-3 items maximum
Next (Shaped — next 1-2 cycles)
- Problem validated, solution partially shaped
- Not yet assigned to a team
- May change based on what we learn from "Now" items
- 3-5 items maximum
Later (Raw — ideas worth exploring)
- Problems we believe are real but haven't validated
- No solution shaped yet
- Will be promoted to "Next" when evidence supports it, or killed
- No limit, but prune quarterly
Roadmap Items Are Outcomes, Not Features
Each roadmap item is framed as a problem to solve or an outcome to achieve:
Bad (feature-list roadmap):
- Build team collaboration features
- Add CSV export
- Redesign settings page
Good (outcome-based roadmap):
- Reduce time-to-first-value for team signups from 15 min to under 5 min
- Enable users to get their data out without contacting support
- Reduce settings-related support tickets by 50%
The solution emerges during shaping, not during roadmap planning.
Shape Up Cycle Planning
For teams using Shape Up cycles:
- Betting table: Leadership reviews shaped pitches and bets on what to build next cycle. Not everything gets picked.
- Cool-down: 1-2 weeks between cycles for bug fixes, exploration, and shaping future work.
- No carry-over: Work that doesn't ship in a cycle is not automatically carried over. It must be re-pitched.
Presenting the Roadmap
Keep it to one page or one screen. If your roadmap needs scrolling, it's too detailed.
Format as a simple table:
| Horizon | Outcome | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Now | Reduce onboarding drop-off to under 30% | 5 interviews, 60% current drop-off | In progress, week 2/3 |
| Next | Enable self-serve data export | 12 support tickets/month | Shaped, needs team |
| Later | Multi-workspace support | 3 enterprise prospects requested | Unvalidated |
Guidelines
- CRITICAL: NEVER put dates on roadmap items beyond 6 weeks. You don't know and pretending you do erodes trust.
- NEVER build a feature-list roadmap. Organize by outcomes and problems.
- ALWAYS limit "Now" to 1-3 items. If you're working on 8 things, you're finishing none of them.
- NEVER let "Later" items skip to "Now" without shaping and evidence.
- ALWAYS prune "Later" quarterly. Kill items that haven't gained evidence in 3 months.
- ALWAYS review and update the roadmap at the start of every cycle, not just quarterly.
- NEVER present a roadmap without evidence for each item. A roadmap without evidence is a wish list.
Built on Shape Up (Basecamp) cycle planning and the Now/Next/Later framework. Skills from productskills.
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/assimovt/productskills/roadmap-planning">View roadmap-planning on skillZs</a>