diff-intake
Reads a PR or branch diff and produces a structured YAML change brief for downstream analytics instrumentation skills. Use this as the first step whenever a user shares a PR link, branch comparison, or raw diff and wants to understand what changed, what needs tracking, or how to instrument a feature. Trigger on phrases like "review this PR", "what changed in this branch", "help me instrument this diff", "check analytics coverage for this change", or any request to start the analytics review workflow.
How do I install this agent skill?
npx skills add https://github.com/amplitude/mcp-marketplace --skill diff-intakeIs this agent skill safe to install?
- Gen Agent Trust Hubpass
This skill analyzes code changes from pull requests and branches to generate analytics instrumentation briefs. It is generally safe for development use; however, it lacks explicit safeguards against indirect prompt injection, which could occur if a pull request contains malicious instructions within code comments.
- Socketpass
No alerts
- Snykwarn
Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue
What does this agent skill do?
diff-intake
Follow this skill step by step. You are step 1 of the analytics instrumentation workflow. Produce a compact YAML change brief that downstream skills (discover-event-surfaces, instrument-events) will consume. Keep the output machine-readable and precise — no prose around the YAML block.
Step 1: Gather changed files and categorize
Fetch the list of changed files from the source, then categorize each one.
Fetching changes
- PR URL
gh pr view <number-or-url>gh pr view <pr-number> --json files --jq '.files[] | "\(.path)\t+\(.additions) -\(.deletions)\t"' - Branch comparison
git log <main|master>..<branch>git diff --stat <main|master>..<branch> - Ambiguous mention (PR number, branch name): infer the right form and fetch without asking unless auth fails.
Categorize files
Assign each file to a category based on its path:
- Core Logic: application source (e.g. src/auth/login.py, database/models.ts)
- Generated: anything with
generatedin its path - Testing: test files
- Config / Dependencies: package.json, docker-compose.yml, etc.
- Documentation: READMEs, docs/
- Noise: lock-files, .svg, auto-generated migrations
For each file, record: path, category, change type (Added / Modified / Deleted), and analytics likelihood (1–5).
Step 2: Build the file summary map
Read every single Core Logic file and create the file summary map. Only process and include Core Logic files.
Fetching detailed diffs
- PR
gh pr view <number-or-url> --json baseRefOid,headRefOidUsing the response, get a detailed diffgit diff <baseRefOid>...<headRefOid> -- <file1> <file2> <file_n> - Branch comparison
git diff main..feature/foo -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>
For each file, record
summary— 2-line summary of what changedstack— frontend, backend, or shared
Also derive user-facing changes and touched surfaces
While reading the diff and the changed files, also produce the higher-level signals that downstream event discovery needs:
user_facing_changes— a flat list of concrete behavior changes that matter to a user, PM, or analyst. Each item should describe what a user can now do, see, or experience differently. Omit purely internal refactors.surfaces.components— the UI components, routes, pages, handlers, or other interaction surfaces directly involved in those user-facing changes. Prefer likely instrumentation points over low-level helpers.
For each surface, record:
name— component, route, page, hook, or surface namefile— repo-relative pathchange—added,modified, ordeleted
If the change is backend-only or has no clear interactive surface, omit
surfaces.components rather than inventing one.
Step 3: Classify the overall change
Infer the change type and analytics scope:
| Type | Analytics implication |
|---|---|
| feat | High — new surfaces likely need tracking |
| fix | Low–Medium — may affect existing event conditions |
| refactor | Low — tracking paths may move, regression risk |
| perf | Low — usually no tracking impact |
| revert | Medium — need to check what tracking was lost |
| style / docs / test / build / ci / chore | None — skip analytics analysis |
analytics_scope = highest implication present:
none— only no-impact typeslow— only perf/refactormedium— fixhigh— any feature or capability addition
If analytics_scope is none, emit the brief and note that downstream skills are not needed.
Step 4: Emit the YAML brief
Output only the YAML block — no prose before or after. Follow the format exactly. List each file individually in file_summary_map (no globs).
change_brief:
classification:
primary: feat # dominant conventional commit type
types: [feat, fix] # all types detected
analytics_scope: high # none | low | medium | high
stack: frontend # frontend | backend | fullstack
summary: "One sentence describing the overall change"
user_facing_changes:
- "Users can now upload an avatar with drag-and-drop and preview it before saving."
surfaces:
components:
- name: "AvatarUpload"
file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
change: modified
file_summary_map: # each entry includes a layer field
- file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
summary: "New component for avatar upload with drag-and-drop and preview"
layer: frontend # frontend | backend | shared
- file: "src/api/upload.ts"
summary: "Upload endpoint handler, validates file type and persists to S3"
layer: backend
How can the creator link this skill?
Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.
<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/amplitude/mcp-marketplace/diff-intake">View diff-intake on skillZs</a>