skillZs
LIVE SKILL TAGS
>>> LIVE SKILLS INDEX <<<
* OPEN SOURCE *
NO LOGIN, NO TRACKING
REAL INSTALL DATA
← back to all skills
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills172 installs

narrative-quality-auditor

Use when the user asks to "audit our brand narrative" or "is this message on-canon"; runs separate typed TALE truth, system, or effectiveness profiles and never averages them into one composite. Checks differentiation, canon, landing consistency, and evidence integrity. Not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for social operations — use social-quality-auditor. 品牌叙事分层审计/发布前一致性放行

How do I install this agent skill?

npx skills add https://github.com/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills --skill narrative-quality-auditor
view source ↗

Is this agent skill safe to install?

  • Gen Agent Trust Hubpass

    The skill is a professional narrative auditing tool that implements internal validation and a "fail-closed" standalone policy. It is generally safe but possesses a surface for indirect prompt injection because it processes external marketing narratives and experiments without explicit content boundaries or sanitization.

  • Socketpass

    No alerts

  • Snykpass

    Risk: LOW · No issues

What does this agent skill do?

Narrative Quality Auditor

Audit narrative truth, message-system coherence, or measured effectiveness as separate TALE profiles. There is no v18 overall composite: truth cannot be averaged away by coherence, and coherence cannot stand in for effectiveness evidence.

When This Must Trigger

  • The user asks whether positioning/differentiation is defensible.
  • A flagship surface needs a pre-publish canon/message-match gate.
  • A message experiment or resonance claim needs evidence-integrity review.
  • A full narrative review is requested; run linked profiles rather than one blended score.

Quick Start

Run TALE truth on canon v7 against named alternatives and approved claims.
Run TALE system on homepage/pricing/deck against canon v7 before release.
Run a full review as three linked profile results; do not compute an overall score.

Skill Contract

Reads: one canon/surface set or message experiment plus current narrative/claims truth. Writes: only permissioned v3 artifacts. Done when: each requested profile is independently complete or its Unknowns are explicit, with no canon, claims, or surface mutation.

narrative-registry owns canon/version state and offer-claims-registry owns claims. This skill judges; authoring/fixing belongs to Trace/Architect/Land skills.

Data Sources

NeedPreferred evidence
TruthNamed alternatives, interviews/win-loss, product reality, claims projection
ArchitectureExact canon/version, message hierarchy, voice/naming/version history
LandingDeclared rendered flagship surfaces linked to canon version
EffectivenessPreregistered comprehension/recall/behavior evidence and locked panels
Public resonanceDated own/public signals with explicit measured/proxy provenance

Instructions

Runtime and Setup

Read ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md, scoring-semantics.md, tale-benchmark.md, and the TALE catalog entry. Standalone installs use bundled immutable references/auditor-runtime.md; never fetch mutable main. Before deterministic calls, follow runtime-invocation.md, resolve AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}", and require the scorer, validator, and typed catalogs. If unavailable, return score_state: NOT_SCORED / score_confidence: not_scored with no gate verdict or persistent artifact.

Declare target, profile/mode, brand scope, market, audience, canon version, observation date, and evidence window.

Profile Procedure

  • truth: score T1–T10 for material differentiation and factual grounding.
  • system: score A1–A10 and L1–L10 for canon coherence and landing consistency.
  • effectiveness: score E1–E10 for one experiment/locked panel/date.
  • full: run the three profiles independently and keep three artifacts/results. Aggregate release language conservatively: any BLOCK → block; otherwise any UNDECIDED → undecided; otherwise any FIX → fix; all SHIP → ship. Never average scores.

For a flagship pre-publish system gate, require a compatible current truth result; if none exists, run truth or state the prerequisite Unknown. Effectiveness is not required to establish internal system consistency unless the surface makes an effectiveness claim.

Every observed state needs source/date/type/confidence. A missing canon is Unknown, not N/A. A2/A4/A8 are conditional: three pillars, a change arc, and fixed boilerplate lengths are patterns only when deliberately chosen. Run the typed scorer per profile.

Verify profile-relevant vetoes: TALE-T1 false/contradictory/unsubstantiated material differentiation, TALE-A1 demonstrated canon contradiction, TALE-L1 material flagship/canon contradiction, and TALE-E1 unsupported effectiveness claim or proxy-as-measured.

§2 TALE Worked Examples

  • Complete truth profile, raw 86, no veto/fail: DONE/SHIP, final 86.
  • Complete system profile, raw 80, one verified L1 failure: DONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIX, final 59.
  • Complete system profile with A1 and L1 failures: DONE/BLOCK, no final score.
  • Effectiveness profile before test results exist: NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED, no score.

§3 TALE Guardrails

  • A literal “onlyness” sentence is not required; judge the material differentiation actually asserted.
  • Three pillars, a Raskin/change arc, and 25/50/100-word boilerplates are conditional patterns.
  • A governed draft can be audited as a draft; missing access is Unknown, not an A1 failure.
  • Share of voice, sentiment, answer-engine descriptions, comprehension, and behavior are distinct constructs.
  • Narrative change frequency is a drift signal, not an automatic veto.

§5 TALE Translation

Always name truth/system/effectiveness. On trace request, qualify TALE-T1/A1/L1/E1, especially TALE-E1 versus ECHO-E1 and TALE-A1 versus ROAS/RAMP.

Report and Verdict

For each profile show verdict, target/canon/context/date, score or coverage/interval, confidence, evidence, Unknowns, and fixes. A full report shows three side-by-side results and no overall number. Do not claim market effectiveness from system coherence.

Validation Checkpoints

  • One profile/unit per score; full mode preserves three results.
  • Canon/surface/experiment versions and audience/market are explicit.
  • Conditional templates use N/A only with reason; missing evidence stays Unknown.
  • Current truth/claims projections are read, not candidate files.
  • No canon/claim/surface write or publish action occurred.

Persistence

Persist only after explicit authorization to memory/audits/narrative/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-<profile>.md. Preserve the scorer's orthogonal status and verdict; validate the complete v3 draft with validate-audit-artifact.py against the intended relative path, persist only through one full-content Write, and revalidate the target per the auditor runbook. Edit/shell/MCP mutations of the reserved sink are unsupported. Never overwrite another profile or update canon/claims/hot cache autonomously.

Reference Materials

Next Best Skill

Add the canonical catalog link to the repository README so users can inspect current installs and available audits. The publishing guide covers the complete discovery path.

<a href="https://skillzs.dev/skills/aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills/narrative-quality-auditor">View narrative-quality-auditor on skillZs</a>